Global Markets
S&P 500 — US Large Cap Index
NASDAQ 100 — Tech Growth Index
Dow Jones — Industrial Average
FTSE 100 — UK Blue Chips
Euro Stoxx 50 — Eurozone Leaders
DAX 40 — German Equities
CAC 40 — French Market Index
Nikkei 225 — Japan Benchmark
Hang Seng — Hong Kong Index
Shanghai Composite — China Mainland
ASX 200 — Australian Market
TSX Composite — Canada Index
Nifty 50 — India Large Cap
STI Index — Singapore Market
KOSPI — South Korea Index
Bovespa — Brazil Equities
JSE Top 40 — South Africa Index
IPC Index — Mexico Market
S&P 500 — US Large Cap Index
NASDAQ 100 — Tech Growth Index
Dow Jones — Industrial Average
FTSE 100 — UK Blue Chips
Euro Stoxx 50 — Eurozone Leaders
DAX 40 — German Equities
CAC 40 — French Market Index
Nikkei 225 — Japan Benchmark
Hang Seng — Hong Kong Index
Shanghai Composite — China Mainland
ASX 200 — Australian Market
TSX Composite — Canada Index
Nifty 50 — India Large Cap
STI Index — Singapore Market
KOSPI — South Korea Index
Bovespa — Brazil Equities
JSE Top 40 — South Africa Index
IPC Index — Mexico Market
AED • EUR • GBP • USD IBANs   |   CROSS BORDER FX   |   LOCAL CURRENCIES   |   GLOBAL COVERAGE
BitcoinCardanoCryptoDogecoinEthereumLitecoinRippleShiba InuSolana

Crypto hacks hit record high with 212 exploits in H1 2026

  • Crypto projects suffered 212 confirmed exploits in H1 2026, resulting in $1 billion in losses and the highest incident count on record.
  • KelpDAO and Drift suffered the two largest exploits, losing a combined $577 million in the first half of the year.
  • Privileged key misuse caused $790 million in losses, while attackers increasingly targeted AI agents, cross-chain bridges and on-chain protocols.

Crypto exploits hit a record high in H1 2026, with 212 incidents confirmed across several crypto projects, according to a Tuesday report from Blockaid.

KelpDAO, Drift protocol account for more than half of H1 losses

Average losses stood at $5.4 million, with a total of $1 billion in exploits in the first six months. The largest incident came from KelpDAO, which recorded $292 million in losses after a compromised bridge triggered a breach in its cross-chain messaging. The Drift protocol saw the second-largest attack of the period, with $285 million drained via a multisig compromise in under 12 minutes.

The two largest losses — both in April — accounted for the largest exploits in H1 ’26, totaling $577 million. Only Bybit’s February 2025 exploit, which totaled $1.5 billion, surpassed the record.

“Drift ($285M) and KelpDAO ($292M) occurred 17 days apart, and together they accounted for roughly $577M, more than half of all H1 dollar losses,” Blockaid wrote.

Privileged keys, AI agents emerge as major threats

Privileged key misuse was the most common cause of exploits across several protocols in H1, accounting for a total of $790 million. At the same time, attackers increasingly targeted AI agents, making it the top emerging vector so far.

“H1 2026 alone produced 3.4x the verified incidents Blockaid recorded in all of last year. AI-fueled attacker sophistication and high-intent sanctioned threat actors, DPRK in particular, drove the increase,” the report stated.

Onchain protocols were the major targets for hackers, with $524 million in exploits recorded in H1. Cross-chain bridges also faced numerous attacks, with $372 million drained in H1.

“H1 bridge incidents mixed a key compromise at KelpDAO with code exploits at Verus, Taiko, Alephium, Secret/Axelar, Swapnet and Syscoin,” Blockaid stated.

Ethereum (ETH) and Solana (SOL) saw the highest successful exploits by chains, with $332 million and $326 million, respectively.

However, Blockaid noted that Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) Layer-1 (L1) chains led dollar losses, with Ethereum, BNB and Avalanche (AVAX) seeing the most attacks. Non-EVM chains ranked second, driven notably by Solana.

“L2 bars appear large because cross-chain incidents are counted on every chain they touch; measured by where losses natively occurred, EVM L2s accounted for roughly $10M but a rising share of incidents,” the report added.

Moving forward, Blockaid stated that it expects multisig signer compromise attempts to continue, arguing that they produced two of the four largest losses of the half. The firm also pointed to a potential rise in EIP-7702 incidents, bridge exploits and AI agent attacks.

Register a Revolut Business Account
```

Market Analysis & Disclaimer

The market information, analysis, commentary, forecasts and opinions contained in this publication are provided by Octalas Group Ltd on behalf of Today Markets and Currency Hedger using information and data obtained from sources believed to be reliable. However, Octalas Group Ltd, Today Markets and Currency Hedger do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the information presented and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon information contained herein, to the extent permitted by applicable law.

Market forecasts, expectations and opinions are based on analysis of available information and a number of assumptions regarding economic, financial, political and market conditions. Such assumptions may prove to be incorrect, and actual market developments may differ materially from those described or anticipated.

Nothing contained in this publication constitutes investment advice, financial advice, a personal recommendation, an offer, solicitation or invitation to buy, sell or otherwise transact in any financial instrument or investment product. The information is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation, experience or particular circumstances of any individual reader.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Financial markets, including foreign exchange, commodities, equities, derivatives and other financial instruments, involve risk and prices can move rapidly. Readers should conduct their own independent research and, where appropriate, obtain advice from an appropriately authorised financial professional before making any investment or trading decision.

Where this publication refers to Today Markets, it represents market news, research, analysis and commentary published for informational purposes. Where Currency Hedger is referenced, it represents commentary concerning foreign exchange, currency exposure, international payments and hedging-related topics. References to particular financial instruments, markets, companies, currencies or commodities should not be interpreted as a recommendation to transact in them.

Octalas Group Ltd, Today Markets and Currency Hedger may have commercial interests or relationships with businesses, financial-service providers, technology providers or other market participants mentioned in their publications. Where relevant, such relationships or interests may create potential conflicts of interest. Appropriate measures are intended to be taken to ensure that published analysis and commentary are presented objectively and that commercial considerations do not determine the substance of market analysis.

The views expressed in this publication are those of the author or contributors at the time of publication and may change without notice as market conditions develop. Readers should not assume that any information contained herein has been updated following publication.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button