Global Markets
S&P 500 — US Large Cap Index
NASDAQ 100 — Tech Growth Index
Dow Jones — Industrial Average
FTSE 100 — UK Blue Chips
Euro Stoxx 50 — Eurozone Leaders
DAX 40 — German Equities
CAC 40 — French Market Index
Nikkei 225 — Japan Benchmark
Hang Seng — Hong Kong Index
Shanghai Composite — China Mainland
ASX 200 — Australian Market
TSX Composite — Canada Index
Nifty 50 — India Large Cap
STI Index — Singapore Market
KOSPI — South Korea Index
Bovespa — Brazil Equities
JSE Top 40 — South Africa Index
IPC Index — Mexico Market
S&P 500 — US Large Cap Index
NASDAQ 100 — Tech Growth Index
Dow Jones — Industrial Average
FTSE 100 — UK Blue Chips
Euro Stoxx 50 — Eurozone Leaders
DAX 40 — German Equities
CAC 40 — French Market Index
Nikkei 225 — Japan Benchmark
Hang Seng — Hong Kong Index
Shanghai Composite — China Mainland
ASX 200 — Australian Market
TSX Composite — Canada Index
Nifty 50 — India Large Cap
STI Index — Singapore Market
KOSPI — South Korea Index
Bovespa — Brazil Equities
JSE Top 40 — South Africa Index
IPC Index — Mexico Market
AED • EUR • GBP • USD IBANs   |   CROSS BORDER FX   |   LOCAL CURRENCIES   |   GLOBAL COVERAGE
MarketsOpinionSoftwareStocksTechTechnical Analysis

Chinese Company Challenges Samsung and SK hynix, But It Still Has a Long Way to Go

The headlines are strong. Chinese company YMTC has risen to third place worldwide in NAND memory shipments, overtaking Japan’s Kioxia. Comments have already emerged suggesting that Korean dominance of the memory market is under threat and that the future of NAND could belong to China. However, there is still a significant gap between ranking third in shipment volumes and posing a real threat to Samsung or SK hynix. YMTC has indeed made significant progress. In the second quarter, the Chinese company accounted for 14% of global NAND shipments, compared with 25% for Samsung and 22% for SK hynix and Solidigm combined. YMTC overtook Kioxia in terms of shipment volume, but in terms of revenue it still ranked only fifth, behind Micron and Kioxia. This is an important distinction because it shows that the Chinese company is currently selling a large volume of memory, but has yet to establish a comparable position in the most valuable segments of the market. It is also important not to look at the memory market as if all chips were equal. The largest manufacturers have long been shifting part of their production capacity toward more advanced and more profitable solutions. DRAM and HBM memory, used in data centers and artificial intelligence infrastructure, are particularly important here. Demand for these products is currently enormous, and their contribution to the financial performance of the biggest manufacturers continues to grow. NAND remains a very important market, of course. These types of memory are used in smartphones, computers, SSDs, and many other devices. This is the segment where YMTC has considerably more room for further growth, particularly if it manages to increase its international sales. Apple could be a very important customer here, as the company is testing Chinese memory products and looking for ways to diversify its supply chain. If YMTC does gain access to a larger share of Apple’s supply chain, it could significantly accelerate the company’s growth. That does not change the fact that the memory industry requires enormous investment. Building fabrication plants costs billions of dollars, developing each new generation of technology requires continuous spending, and increasing production does not guarantee that high margins can be maintained. YMTC may therefore be able to rapidly increase its share of the NAND market, but translating that growth into a position comparable to Samsung or SK hynix will be much more difficult. YMTC’s current position therefore does not yet represent a threat to the dominance of Samsung and SK hynix. It does, however, demonstrate something equally important: China is capable of entering the global NAND elite, rapidly expanding production, and gradually taking market share from companies that have controlled this segment for years. That alone is a major development. YMTC wants to go even further and, according to reports, plans to challenge for the number one position worldwide by the end of 2027. Its planned public offering is expected to raise around $5 billion to fund production expansion and research. It is also worth looking at the bigger picture. China is no longer simply trying to copy Western technologies. It is building its own companies, its own factories, and its own technological ecosystem. YMTC is one of the best examples of this process. China may still be several years behind the global leaders in some of the most advanced technologies, but that gap no longer looks like a barrier that Beijing is incapable of overcoming. And that is precisely why YMTC’s rise to third place is more significant than the 14% figure alone might suggest. It does not yet signal the end of Samsung’s or SK hynix’s dominance. What it does show is that China’s semiconductor industry is capable of steadily increasing its scale, capturing additional market segments, and leveraging the enormous resources Beijing is directing toward the development of domestic technology. For Samsung, SK hynix, and Micron, this is not yet a reason to panic. It is, however, another signal that cannot be ignored. If YMTC maintains its current pace, today’s battle for third place could be only the beginning of a much larger struggle for control of the memory market.

Source: xStation5

Register a Revolut Business Account
```

Market Analysis & Disclaimer

The market information, analysis, commentary, forecasts and opinions contained in this publication are provided by Octalas Group Ltd on behalf of Today Markets and Currency Hedger using information and data obtained from sources believed to be reliable. However, Octalas Group Ltd, Today Markets and Currency Hedger do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the information presented and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon information contained herein, to the extent permitted by applicable law.

Market forecasts, expectations and opinions are based on analysis of available information and a number of assumptions regarding economic, financial, political and market conditions. Such assumptions may prove to be incorrect, and actual market developments may differ materially from those described or anticipated.

Nothing contained in this publication constitutes investment advice, financial advice, a personal recommendation, an offer, solicitation or invitation to buy, sell or otherwise transact in any financial instrument or investment product. The information is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation, experience or particular circumstances of any individual reader.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Financial markets, including foreign exchange, commodities, equities, derivatives and other financial instruments, involve risk and prices can move rapidly. Readers should conduct their own independent research and, where appropriate, obtain advice from an appropriately authorised financial professional before making any investment or trading decision.

Where this publication refers to Today Markets, it represents market news, research, analysis and commentary published for informational purposes. Where Currency Hedger is referenced, it represents commentary concerning foreign exchange, currency exposure, international payments and hedging-related topics. References to particular financial instruments, markets, companies, currencies or commodities should not be interpreted as a recommendation to transact in them.

Octalas Group Ltd, Today Markets and Currency Hedger may have commercial interests or relationships with businesses, financial-service providers, technology providers or other market participants mentioned in their publications. Where relevant, such relationships or interests may create potential conflicts of interest. Appropriate measures are intended to be taken to ensure that published analysis and commentary are presented objectively and that commercial considerations do not determine the substance of market analysis.

The views expressed in this publication are those of the author or contributors at the time of publication and may change without notice as market conditions develop. Readers should not assume that any information contained herein has been updated following publication.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button