S&P 500 — US Large Cap Index
FTSE 100 — UK Blue Chips
Euro Stoxx 50 — Eurozone Leaders
DAX 40 — German Equities
CAC 40 — French Market Index
Nikkei 225 — Japan Benchmark
Hang Seng — Hong Kong Index
Shanghai Composite — China Mainland
ASX 200 — Australian Market
TSX Composite — Canada Index
Nifty 50 — India Large Cap
STI Index — Singapore Market
KOSPI — South Korea Index
Bovespa — Brazil Equities
JSE Top 40 — South Africa Index
IPC Index — Mexico Market
Does Iran actually want a “deal”? Trump shifts his narrative on Iran and Spain
President Donald Trump reversed his stance twice in the space of a single day — first announcing that the deal with Iran was “dead” following the attacks on merchant ships in the Strait of Hormuz, and then suggesting that Tehran was desperately seeking an agreement. This 180-degree turnaround in the space of a dozen or so hours clearly illustrates how Trump’s unpredictable communication affects market sentiment in real time.
From ‘the deal is over’ to ‘they want the deal so badly’
On Wednesday 8 July, US index futures fell and oil prices soared by more than 5% after Trump declared that the truce with Iran was “over” following Iran’s attack on merchant ships. The S&P 500 closed the session down 0.28 per cent at 7,482.71 points. Just a few hours later, Trump changed his tone, claiming that Iran had “just phoned” and “wants a deal very, very badly”, though he noted that he did not know whether Tehran could be trusted to honour the terms. This news immediately triggered a reversal in market sentiment — futures contracts on US indices turned green. When a reporter asked why Iran was attacking merchant ships if it wanted a deal so badly, Trump replied briefly: “Because they’re a bit mad.” This pattern is nothing new — since March, futures contracts have repeatedly reacted sharply to successive rounds of Trump’s rhetoric towards Iran, falling at times following threats of strikes and rebounding at other times following signs of an impending agreement.
Spain: from a ‘lost country’ to a ‘very generous partner’
A similar narrative shift affected Spain. At the NATO summit in Ankara, Trump described Madrid as a “lost cause” and a “completely hopeless” partner, ordering Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to immediately suspend all trade with Spain, including visas. The reason was Spain’s refusal to accept NATO’s new defence spending target of 5 per cent of GDP, as well as its earlier blocking of the use of joint military bases for attacks on Iran. On the flight back to Washington aboard Air Force One, Trump changed his tone, claiming that Spain had “come round completely” and had been “very generous” — it had “honoured the request for numerous payments”. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, for his part, described the conversation as “very cordial”, noting that it had focused mainly on the World Cup and golf, rather than military spending.
How likely is an embargo on Spain? Despite his statements, Trump has real, albeit limited, legal means at his disposal to impose an embargo.
The Department of the Treasury, the Department of Commerce and the Office of the US Trade Representative are due to draw up a “list” of Spanish products potentially subject to an embargo in the coming days, which suggests a selective rather than a blanket approach. It is worth bearing in mind that EU trade rules require a uniform approach towards all EU countries, which complicates unilateral action against Spain alone.
The markets are performing very well this morning. Spanish shares are up 0.8%, whilst oil is down by over 2%.
Source: xStation
