Global Markets
S&P 500 — US Large Cap Index
NASDAQ 100 — Tech Growth Index
Dow Jones — Industrial Average
FTSE 100 — UK Blue Chips
Euro Stoxx 50 — Eurozone Leaders
DAX 40 — German Equities
CAC 40 — French Market Index
Nikkei 225 — Japan Benchmark
Hang Seng — Hong Kong Index
Shanghai Composite — China Mainland
ASX 200 — Australian Market
TSX Composite — Canada Index
Nifty 50 — India Large Cap
STI Index — Singapore Market
KOSPI — South Korea Index
Bovespa — Brazil Equities
JSE Top 40 — South Africa Index
IPC Index — Mexico Market
S&P 500 — US Large Cap Index
NASDAQ 100 — Tech Growth Index
Dow Jones — Industrial Average
FTSE 100 — UK Blue Chips
Euro Stoxx 50 — Eurozone Leaders
DAX 40 — German Equities
CAC 40 — French Market Index
Nikkei 225 — Japan Benchmark
Hang Seng — Hong Kong Index
Shanghai Composite — China Mainland
ASX 200 — Australian Market
TSX Composite — Canada Index
Nifty 50 — India Large Cap
STI Index — Singapore Market
KOSPI — South Korea Index
Bovespa — Brazil Equities
JSE Top 40 — South Africa Index
IPC Index — Mexico Market
AED • EUR • GBP • USD IBANs   |   CROSS BORDER FX   |   LOCAL CURRENCIES   |   GLOBAL COVERAGE
GoldMarketsOpinionTechnical Analysis

China’s Gold-buying spree continues with Hong Kong ETFs hitting records

  • China and Hong Kong registered inflows in Gold ETFs during April, with the latter seeing record-high numbers.
  • Chinese demand for Gold ETFs remains strong, driven by institutional purchases and lower yields.
  • Increasing ETF demand tends to support spot prices, which have been hovering between $4,400 and $4,900 since late March.

China continued to lead Asia’s push into Gold buying via Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) in April, with Hong Kong registering its highest inflows ever, as Gold prices stabilized after a major pullback in March.

China’s Gold ETFs registered inflows of $498 million in April, according to data from the World Gold Council (WGC). Asia’s largest economy contributed significantly to the rebound in global Gold ETF inflows, particularly when adding Hong Kong’s $732 million record high. 

The surge in ETF inflows in Hong Kong was due to the debut of the CSOP Gold ETF, with about $720 million in assets under management, making it Hong Kong’s largest local physical-gold ETF.

China and Hong Kong were among the top 5 countries with higher Gold ETF inflows in April. Source: World Gold Council.

Besides the one-off from Hong Kong, “Gold ETFs in Mainland China continued to draw inflows amid elevated geopolitical tensions, falling yields, and continued official-sector gold buying announcement,” the World Gold Council said. 

Looking at the broader region, Gold ETFs in Asia extended their inflow streak to eight months, adding $1.8 billion in April, with positive contributions also from India. Globally, Gold ETFs recorded inflows of $6.6 billion in the month, partly reversing March’s outflows, with the largest inflows coming from the United Kingdom (UK) with $2.1 billion.

Positive flows via ETFs are a bellwether for spot prices as investor demand via ETFs tends to directly impact the physical market.

Gold prices have traded broadly rangebound since the end of March, within a band of between $4,400 and $4,900. While geopolitics keeps the precious’ metal safe-haven appeal intact, the quick hawkish repricing of global central banks’ rate outlook is also capping gains. 

April’s ETF rebound shows that Gold has somewhat regained its safe-haven appeal. While investor demand through ETFs could keep providing a solid floor for the precious metal, any significant gains would need a decline in energy prices and messages from central banks that the current plans to keep interest rates at high levels are no longer on the table. 

Register a Revolut Business Account
```

Market Analysis & Disclaimer

The market information, analysis, commentary, forecasts and opinions contained in this publication are provided by Octalas Group Ltd on behalf of Today Markets and Currency Hedger using information and data obtained from sources believed to be reliable. However, Octalas Group Ltd, Today Markets and Currency Hedger do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the information presented and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon information contained herein, to the extent permitted by applicable law.

Market forecasts, expectations and opinions are based on analysis of available information and a number of assumptions regarding economic, financial, political and market conditions. Such assumptions may prove to be incorrect, and actual market developments may differ materially from those described or anticipated.

Nothing contained in this publication constitutes investment advice, financial advice, a personal recommendation, an offer, solicitation or invitation to buy, sell or otherwise transact in any financial instrument or investment product. The information is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation, experience or particular circumstances of any individual reader.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Financial markets, including foreign exchange, commodities, equities, derivatives and other financial instruments, involve risk and prices can move rapidly. Readers should conduct their own independent research and, where appropriate, obtain advice from an appropriately authorised financial professional before making any investment or trading decision.

Where this publication refers to Today Markets, it represents market news, research, analysis and commentary published for informational purposes. Where Currency Hedger is referenced, it represents commentary concerning foreign exchange, currency exposure, international payments and hedging-related topics. References to particular financial instruments, markets, companies, currencies or commodities should not be interpreted as a recommendation to transact in them.

Octalas Group Ltd, Today Markets and Currency Hedger may have commercial interests or relationships with businesses, financial-service providers, technology providers or other market participants mentioned in their publications. Where relevant, such relationships or interests may create potential conflicts of interest. Appropriate measures are intended to be taken to ensure that published analysis and commentary are presented objectively and that commercial considerations do not determine the substance of market analysis.

The views expressed in this publication are those of the author or contributors at the time of publication and may change without notice as market conditions develop. Readers should not assume that any information contained herein has been updated following publication.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button