S&P 500 — US Large Cap Index
FTSE 100 — UK Blue Chips
Euro Stoxx 50 — Eurozone Leaders
DAX 40 — German Equities
CAC 40 — French Market Index
Nikkei 225 — Japan Benchmark
Hang Seng — Hong Kong Index
Shanghai Composite — China Mainland
ASX 200 — Australian Market
TSX Composite — Canada Index
Nifty 50 — India Large Cap
STI Index — Singapore Market
KOSPI — South Korea Index
Bovespa — Brazil Equities
JSE Top 40 — South Africa Index
IPC Index — Mexico Market
“Rammmagedon” ends up in court: Antitrust lawsuit and investments in Korea
The largest DRAM memory manufacturers have come under legal pressure in the United States. Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology have been sued in a federal court in California by a group of consumers and small businesses alleging price-fixing and artificial supression of memory supply. The case could become one of the more important tests for the market at a time of extreme valuations and shortages.
According to the lawsuit, the manufacturers allegedly coordinated restrictions on the supply of traditional DRAM modules, including DDR3 and DDR4, while at the same time redirecting a larger share of production capacity toward HBM. The plaintiffs claim these actions led to market shortages and a sharp rise in memory component prices.
Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron control the vast majority of the global DRAM supply. This means that any coordinated production cuts would have a much greater impact on the market than similar actions in less specialized industries. In recent weeks, makers of electronics, consoles, and computer hardware have increasingly pointed to higher component costs as a reason for price increases. For consumers, the problem is therefore not limited to the PC parts market, but also affects computers, consoles, smartphones, and other devices that use DRAM. At this stage, however, these are still only allegations. The case will require proving that the observed supply constraints were not solely the result of a rational response by manufacturers to the AI boom, but stemmed from coordinated conduct that restricted competition. Potentially most significant is the fact that RAM makers, including Samsung and SK Hynix, which are named now, were once already found guilty of exactly this kind of behavior in the 1998–2002 period.
On the other hand, a nearly identical lawsuit reached court in 2018, in which Samsung, Hynix, and Micron were again accused of price-fixing, but the court then deemed the evidence insufficient. At the same time, Samsung and SK Hynix are announcing massive investment plans in South Korea, putting considerable pressure on valuations of companies in the sector, which are currently supported by expectations of prolonged shortages. As part of a government program to expand the semiconductor ecosystem, both companies are to build new fabs, with the total scale of the project counted in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Any margin pressure from additional supply, if it materializes, will be significantly delayed, however, because building and bringing advanced manufacturing capacity online takes years.
MU.US (D1)
The company’s uptrend is very strong and steep, but the FIBO level helps identify potential resistance and support zones. If, for some reason, supply were to take the initiative, strong resistance would most likely be the (also psychological) $1,000 level. For buyers, the next target is a broad resistance zone around $1,300. Source: xStation5
